Stay up to date

Transportation is Freedom

October 1st, 2012 | Author: Sam
Category: Get Involved, Transit, Uncategorized

“Transportation is freedom” was one of the take-away points from Jarrett Walker‘s presentation at the Heartland Active Transportation Summit on Friday, September 28, 2012. Walker earns his living thinking about public transit and helping others do the same. Therefore, it was no surprise that he offered many interesting questions, theories, and terms.

My Photo The idea that “transportation is freedom” is so obvious that it is often overlooked. Hearing Walker articulate this sentiment so eloquently helped me understand the attraction to owning a car. When people have immediate access to any place in the vicinity, they feel free. Anyone who has been car-free for even a short period of time knows the disadvantages to depending on other people for rides. His point is that if people have access to convenient transit, they can feel that same freedom. Transportation, then, is a form of agency, the power to do what we want to do.

Walker explained that five factors impacted the efficacy of transit: (1) frequency, (2) span, (3) speed, (4) reliability, and (5) capacity. I’ll explain what each of these means in terms of buses. Frequency means how often the bus comes. Span refers to how early it starts running and how late it stops running. Speed means how fast it goes. Reliability means it is there when it should be. And capacity means how many people it can accommodate. Walker is an advocate for choosing the appropriate technology (meaning the kind of vehicle) and argued during his presentation that technology usually doesn’t fix any of the problems that can arise with these five factors. At the extremes, technology can impact capacity and span .

Ran-630-autotram-extra-grand-630w If you get a bigger bus, you can fit more people. If a city spends more money installing a light rail that doesn’t need an operating, then it can run the light rail into the wee hours of the morning. However, although we are emotionally connected to speed and reliability, technology generally doesn’t affect them. He explained that these two factors are determined by how long the vehicle stops and by what can get in its way. So, if a bus has a dedicated lane, it can be just as fast as a light rail. Span and frequency are the most cost-intensive factors, after the initial investment, because they depend on employing more people to operate the vehicles. Speed, reliability, and capacity all get better as the system becomes more efficient. He goes on to suggest that when city planners/city council members try to imagine the needs of people using transit, frequency is the most difficult to explain to habitual car-users. Speed, reliability, and capacity are part of the personal-vehicle experience, and therefore, are easy to imagine. He said that he uses the analogy of a store being open or closed to help habitual car-users understand what it feels like to be subjected to the span of transit. But he runs into problems when he tries to explain why frequency is so important. Often, transit designers conserve costs by having a bus run less often. His analogy about why this is a problem was one of the best things I got from the presentation. He said that to help habitual car-users understand the problem with infrequent service, he asks them to imagine that at the end of their driveway is a gate that only opens once an hour. What a truly poignant analogy! If you have to be somewhere at a certain time, you need to consider when that gate is going to open and get out before you miss it and need to wait for the next opening. Or if you are trying to get home, it doesn’t matter how tired or hungry you are, you will have to wait for that gate to open. To me, that was such a helpful way of articulating why taking public transit is sometimes problematic. He suggested that transit planners make maps that show how frequently buses run to help users make the best choices for them.

These five factors strongly impact the freedom that we experience in our transportation options. Transit can play a big part in cities’ transportation plans if it is appropriately designed and used. Walker’s presentation offered those who attended the summit some new ways of thinking about transit and about how to talk about transit. He has a blog called and a book of the same name.

What did you think of Walker’s talk? Let me know if you want to post a blog about it:

Tourist Mentality

September 7th, 2012 | Author: Jules4110
Category: Activate Omaha, Commuting, Transit

One of the (many) things I love about my job at Activate Omaha is giving presentations.  I don’t know how many I’ve done over the years, but it’s been a fair amount, and the audiences have run the gamut from kindergarteners to senior citizens.  It’s always fascinating to see what part of the presentation resonates with the group and sparks discussion.

Today I presented my usual “What’s Going on With Activate Omaha” to a lunch time service club.  These types of audiences are usually on the older side, and usually more male than female, which was the case today.  The resonating points with this group really struck me, though, leaving me with a “Huh.  Maybe I should blog about this?” feeling.   This post might be better suited over on the ModeShift Omaha site, but I’m going to throw it out here for the sake of conversation:

Why are people so willing to use and embrace alternative transportation as a tourist, but not in their home town?

The information I gleaned from my retroactive focus group today included some of the following quotes:

“We visited my son in Chicago, and used public transit there.  It works really well.”

We hopped on one of those pedi-cabs down in San Antonio.  We got back to our car so much faster and it was fun!”

We took the light rail from the airport and got to our hotel in no time.  It was great.”

This got me to thinking about how many people that have told me about their mostly positive experiences with public transit and bicycles in OTHER cities.   I know, I know…our bus system doesn’t go here and there.   Our streets aren’t this or that.  We don’t have a cool light rail system.  I understand that tourist areas are likely to be spiffed up with visitor’s needs in mind.  I get it.  But are the buses that much sexier in other cities?  Are the streets really that much more bike friendly?

As a tourist, you may not be very familiar with the area, the amount of time it will take to get from point A to point B, or what will happen if you misjudge any number of variables, including your ability to read a transit or bike route map.  You may not  know someone local you can call to pick you up if you misjudge.  Doesn’t that seem inherently “riskier” than jumping on the #2 bus on Dodge and taking a route where you can recite every single landmark between point A and point B with your eyes closed and one hand tied behind your back?  Or riskier than riding your bike to the grocery store a mile away?

Why don’t these vacation experiences of ease and convenience translate back to similar behavior when people get home?    Do we need to rethink and market alternative transportation with a “tourist” (rather than citizen/resident) mentality, or would it matter?

Lots of questions for this weary Friday brain.  Any answers?


Omaha Bikes
1516 Cuming Street | Omaha, NE 68102

Latest Tweet

Twitter: omahabikes


Can't Find It?

Get'ch yo search on!

Get Connected


E-mail Signup

Stay up to date, sign up for updates from Omaha Bikes.
Made possible by funding from the Department of Health and Human Services
© Copyright 2017 | Omaha Bikes | Site by Grain & Mortar